Blog Stats

  • 14,096 hits

DRUGO the Dragon and the Elephant in the Room

by Julian Buchanan Wednesday 27th August 2014

Screen Shot 2014-08-27 at 12.13.49 pm

This is a thought provoking animation. It Illustrates well that prohibition, incarceration and fierce law enforcement have failed to deter illegal drugs (depicted by DRUGO the Dragon).  Indeed prohibition has caused more collateral damage than the illicit drugs would ever posed [see]. But while the analogy in this animation is thought provoking and challenges the folly of prohibition, it is also somewhat misleading. While DRUGO, the outlawed and persecuted dragon in the animation was demonised, the many relatives of DRUGO (who we are led to believe are not part of the dragon family), better known as LEGALO (alcohol, tobacco, caffeine, pharmaceutical drugs, food drugs etc) – have been living like royalty in the kingdom, fully accommodated, promoted, integrated and supported by Kings and Queens across the nations, and enjoyed by the masses. But the LEGALO dragons have been airbrushed out of the animation as if they didn’t exist.

The animation suggests a life without DRUGO might be a desirable utopia but concludes it’s better that we learn to live with DRUGO. As if somehow a world without those drugs that have been criminalised (cannabis, opiates, LSD, cocaine etc) might in some way be desirable? Drugs have never been the main problem – its drug policies and cultures that are the problem. So this utopian ideal – a world without DRUGO – is shared but the animation is silent about the LEGALO dragons and thereby feeds into the distorted dominant discourses on what we have come to regard as ‘drugs’.

The Global Commission of Drug Policy have made a remarkable and helpful contribution to promoting drug reform. This animation is made with good intentions and will no doubt encourage many good outcomes on one level – but if genuine and lasting drug policy reform is to occur we need to acknowledge the propaganda, misinformation and lies at the heart of the problem.

There has never been a war on the drugs. We have a war against a particular drug dragon (DRUGO) not only have the other drug dragons been privileged they are not recognised as dragons. It suggests there is only one threat and one dragon – DRUGO.  So this animation sidesteps the crux of the problem – the fiercely imposed drug apartheid with all its propaganda, misinformation and unfair treatment of illicit drugs and indeed illicit drug users. If we are to tackle the drug apartheid we need to acknowledge and address the institutionalised inequalities, the abuse of power and the misinformation that has created this untenable bifurcation of drugs.

It’s ironic too because the animation suggests society is hostile to drugs and needs to learn to be more tolerant and accommodating of drugs. When in reality society is probably more pro-drugs and using more substances now than it’s ever done with BigPharma and BigLegalDrugsBusiness sitting very nicely with us wherever we go and whatever we do readily supplying and encouraging (legal) drug use. But then they aren’t drug dragons are they?

There is a need for a more honest, mature and informed discussion on ‘drugs’ – one that acknowledges the oppressive, discriminatory and hypocritical position of current laws, policies and attitudes towards substances. Let the debate begin soon.

Julian Buchanan

Ending Drug Prohibition with a Hangover? Global Perspectives


Screen Shot 2014-06-13 at 11.36.49 am


Ending Drug Prohibition with a Hangover? Global Perspectives.

The Community Justice Portal 11th Annual Public Lecture

Sheffield Hallam University, England, 22nd May 2014 60 minute Podcast

We have not had a War on Drugs, nor has the use of drugs for pleasure been prohibited. The 1961 UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs imposed strict controls and punishments on particular substances while other dangerous drugs (alcohol and tobacco in particular) were granted a privileged and promoted status.

This socially constructed bifurcation of substances established a Drugs Apartheid that outlawed particular drugs so what we have is a ‘War between Drugs’ that ultimately became a war on people who used substances that didn’t have government approval. Black and Minority Ethnic groups and the discarded working class have been major casualties in this war. Radical drug law reform rooted in scientific evidence and human rights is needed to end the oppressive and unjust drug laws that have caused more harm than good.

To follow the PREZI presentation while listening to the Podcast go to:

Drunk Driving More Deadly than Drugged Driving by Far

See on Scoop.itDrugs, Society, Human Rights & Justice

A new study finds drunk driving 9 times likelier to kill than drugged driving.

Julian Buchanan‘s insight:

We need an evidence based approach to drug driving and don’t want to repeat the punitive populist ignorance  that has been driving drug policy

See on

45 common myths, lies and misconceptions that inform drug policy

See on Scoop.itDrugs, Society, Human Rights & Justice

Drug law and policy has its roots in fear, ignorance, racism and vested interest. Sadly, this has changed little over the years. Drug law and policy continues to be shaped more by punitive populism and moral crusades rather than scientific evidence, reason and rationality.

Julian Buchanan‘s insight:

I did this for a lecture and thought it might be useful to share – although punchy and accessible in style, each point is carefully considered and can be academically supported.

See on

Metropolitan Police UK releases ‘alarming’ strip-search figures

See on Scoop.itDrugs, Society, Human Rights & Justice

People from black and minority ethnic backgrounds account for more than half of those strip-searched by the Metropolitan Police in the past three years, according to “extremely alarming” figures collected by the force.

See on

ARTICLE: Student Drug Testing vs Positive School Climates: Longitudinal Study on Impact of drug behaviour

See on Scoop.itDrugs, Society, Human Rights & Justice

Conclusions: Student drug testing appears to be less associated with substance use than positive school climates. Nevertheless, even favorable school climates may not be able to influence the use of alcohol, which appears to be quite normative in this age group. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 75, 65–73, 2014)

Julian Buchanan‘s insight:

Drug Testing Students  – a good example of policy led research … that is, there was no evidence to support drug testing of students the policy was not research led -it was policy led (probably to appease a punitive populist political agenda). Now having implemented the drug testing approach (lucrative business btw) research is done to try to support it.


Existing research and practice wisdom would indicate it was not a scheme worth exploring in the first place.

See on

Dr. Sanjay Gupta Explains The Science Behind A Bad Marijuana Trip

See on Scoop.itDrugs, Society, Human Rights & Justice

The neurosurgeon and CNN chief medical correspondent explored the effects of cannabis on our bodies and the benefits of medical marijuana in a 2013…

See on

Follow me on Twitter


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,144 other followers

%d bloggers like this: